Introducing DF5 to Hawaii: A Win-Win Proposition for Energy Stakeholders

A True Bipartisan Solution.

Featured Story: Hawaii News Now

The State of Hawaii stands at a critical juncture, balancing its profound commitment to a sustainable, renewable energy future with the immediate realities of its current energy dependencies and the pressing need to mitigate ongoing environmental impacts. The introduction of DF5 Fuel Pre-Treatment modifier, as outlined in this strategic plan, offers a unique and timely opportunity to forge a win-win outcome for both the oil companies operating within this sensitive ecosystem and the State of Hawaii itself.

DF5 - Build Clean. Build Now. A Bipartisan ACTION PLAN:

This strategic plan outlines a phased approach for introducing DF5 Fuel Treatment, a scientifically validated fuel modifier developed by GreenTec Labs, to key stakeholders in the State of Hawaii, specifically oil companies and state entities. DF5 technology offers significant, immediate benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved fuel efficiency, and enhanced engine health for existing diesel and gasoline engines. Hawaii currently faces a complex energy landscape characterized by high dependence on imported fossil fuels, ambitious renewable energy goals, and an ongoing, high-profile lawsuit against major oil companies alleging climate deception.

In this context, DF5 presents a unique "win-win" value proposition: it enables oil companies to proactively contribute to emissions reduction and demonstrate environmental responsibility, potentially mitigating legal and reputational risks, while simultaneously helping the State of Hawaii accelerate its environmental goals, improve air quality, and achieve economic benefits without requiring immediate, large-scale infrastructure changes. The core objective of this plan is to foster understanding, build credibility, and facilitate the adoption of DF5 as a pragmatic bridge technology that supports Hawaii's transition to a cleaner energy future. The recommended approach involves initial targeted engagement with technical experts and key influencers, followed by broader stakeholder outreach, and culminating in collaborative efforts to integrate DF5 into Hawaii's energy ecosystem, potentially as a constructive component in resolving current disputes.

Section 1: Understanding the Landscape

1.1. Hawaii's Energy Profile & Challenges

Hawaii's energy landscape presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities that make it an ideal candidate for innovative bridge technologies like DF5. As an isolated island chain in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, Hawaii faces distinct energy security concerns that mainland states do not encounter. The state imports approximately 90% of its energy, with a heavy reliance on petroleum for both electricity generation and transportation. This dependence creates significant economic vulnerability, as fluctuations in global oil prices directly impact Hawaii's economy, affecting everything from the cost of living to the competitiveness of its crucial tourism industry.

The geographic isolation of Hawaii also means that its electrical grids are independent and cannot draw power from neighboring states during shortages or emergencies, creating additional resilience challenges. Each island operates its own electrical grid, further complicating the energy transition. This fragmentation necessitates island-specific solutions that can work within existing infrastructure constraints while still advancing environmental goals.

Recognizing these vulnerabilities, Hawaii has established some of the most ambitious renewable energy targets in the United States through the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative. The state aims to achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2045, a goal that requires rapid transformation of its energy systems. While Hawaii has made significant progress in deploying solar, wind, and geothermal resources, the transition remains challenging, particularly for sectors like transportation and heavy industry where electrification faces technical and economic barriers.

Climate change poses an existential threat to Hawaii, with rising sea levels threatening coastal communities, infrastructure, and cultural sites. The state is already experiencing increased frequency and intensity of storms, coral reef bleaching due to warming ocean temperatures, and other climate impacts that directly affect its economy and way of life. This reality has created a strong impetus for climate action at both governmental and community levels.

The economic implications of Hawaii's current energy system are substantial. The state's residents pay among the highest electricity rates in the nation, placing a significant burden on households and businesses. The high cost of energy disproportionately affects lower-income communities and contributes to Hawaii's overall high cost of living. These economic pressures create a compelling case for solutions that can reduce fuel consumption and improve efficiency in the near term, even as longer-term renewable infrastructure is developed.

1.2. The Hawaii Oil Lawsuit

The legal context surrounding fossil fuels in Hawaii has evolved significantly in recent years, culminating in high-profile climate litigation that has important implications for both the state and oil companies. In early 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a 2023 decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court, effectively allowing Honolulu's climate tort case against major oil companies to proceed toward trial. This decision removed a significant obstacle for this and similar climate deception cases across the country.

The lawsuit, initially filed by the City and County of Honolulu and later joined by the State of Hawaii in May 2025, alleges that major oil companies engaged in a decades-long campaign to mislead the public about the risks of fossil fuels and their role in climate change. The plaintiffs argue that these companies should be held accountable for the costs associated with climate-related damages, which in Hawaii include infrastructure damage from sea-level rise, increased storm intensity, and other climate impacts.

A key aspect of the legal strategy is that these lawsuits focus on alleged deception in marketing and public statements, rather than on regulating emissions. This distinction was crucial in the Hawaii Supreme Court's determination that the lawsuits do not conflict with the Clean Air Act, allowing them to proceed under state law. With the Supreme Court declining to intervene, Honolulu's lawsuit has entered the discovery phase, and a trial could potentially take place by the end of 2026.

The implications for oil companies are substantial. Beyond the potential financial liability, these lawsuits represent significant reputational risk and could influence public perception and policy decisions regarding fossil fuels. For the State of Hawaii, the litigation represents an attempt to secure funding for climate adaptation measures and to hold companies accountable for their role in climate change.

This legal context creates both challenges and opportunities for introducing DF5 as a bridge technology. On one hand, the adversarial relationship between the state and oil companies could complicate collaborative efforts. On the other hand, DF5 offers a potential avenue for oil companies to demonstrate good faith efforts to reduce the environmental impact of their products, which could be valuable in both legal and public relations contexts.

1.3. DF5 Technology Overview

DF5 Fuel Treatment represents a sophisticated approach to optimizing fossil fuel combustion and reducing its environmental impact. Developed by GreenTec Labs, DF5 is not a conventional fuel additive but rather a fuel modifier that works at the molecular level to change the chemistry of both diesel and gasoline fuels, resulting in a cleaner and more complete burn.

The technology operates through a five-phase process that systematically treats the entire fuel system from tank to combustion chamber. The initial Purge phase dissolves and mobilizes contaminants within the fuel system, followed by the Flush phase which cleanses accumulated deposits from fuel pathways. The Prime phase revitalizes critical engine components like injectors and valves, while the Optimize phase creates a protective molecular shield on metal components to enhance operational integrity and lubrication. Finally, the Perform phase maintains this optimized fuel ecosystem to deliver consistent performance benefits.

Third-party testing has validated several key benefits of DF5. The Larson Transportation Institute's emissions test demonstrated a 40% reduction in Total Hydrocarbons (THC) emissions, indicating significant environmental improvement. SPL Labs' ASTM D6079 Lubricity Test showed approximately a 16% improvement in lubricity for DF5-treated diesel, which translates to reduced wear on critical engine components. The Southwest Research Institute's IDID test confirmed that DF5 helps control deposit build-up in injectors, maintaining efficiency and performance.

These validated benefits position DF5 as an effective bridge technology with immediate applications in Hawaii's context. The emissions reduction capabilities directly address environmental concerns, while the improved fuel efficiency and reduced maintenance needs offer economic benefits that could help offset Hawaii's high energy costs. As a solution that works with existing infrastructure and engines, DF5 provides a pragmatic approach to reducing the environmental impact of fossil fuels during the transition to renewable energy.

Section 2: Value Proposition of DF5 for Stakeholders

DF5 Fuel Treatment offers a compelling and distinct value proposition for the primary stakeholders in Hawaii’s energy and environmental discussions: oil companies and the State of Hawaii (including its agencies and constituents). The technology’s ability to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency with existing infrastructure creates a unique opportunity for a mutually beneficial outcome, particularly in the context of ongoing legal and environmental pressures.

2.1. For Oil Companies

In the current climate of heightened scrutiny and legal challenges, DF5 provides oil companies operating in or supplying to Hawaii with several strategic advantages:

• Mitigating Legal and Reputational Risks: The ongoing Hawaii oil lawsuit underscores the significant legal and reputational vulnerabilities faced by oil companies. By proactively adopting or promoting DF5-treated fuels, companies can demonstrate a tangible commitment to reducing the environmental impact of their products. This proactive stance can be a powerful narrative tool, showcasing a willingness to be part of the solution rather than solely being perceived as the problem. Such actions could potentially influence settlement discussions in a positive manner or, at the very least, improve public and regulatory perception by highlighting concrete steps towards cleaner operations. Offering a product that demonstrably lowers emissions from existing vehicle fleets and industrial equipment provides a credible response to accusations of inaction or indifference to environmental concerns.

• Enhancing Product Value & Competitiveness: DF5 allows oil companies to differentiate their offerings in the marketplace. Fuels treated with DF5 can be marketed as a premium, cleaner-burning option, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers and businesses. This not only enhances the perceived value of their products but also allows them to compete more effectively in a market increasingly demanding sustainable solutions. Improving the performance (e.g., better fuel economy, cleaner injectors) and reducing the environmental impact of the fuels they sell can create a new value stream and strengthen customer loyalty.

• Operational Benefits (for their own fleets/operations in Hawaii): If oil companies maintain their own vehicle fleets, marine vessels, or stationary power generation equipment in Hawaii, the use of DF5 can yield direct operational benefits. These include tangible fuel savings due to improved efficiency and reduced maintenance costs resulting from cleaner engines and better lubricity. These internal efficiencies can contribute to their bottom line while reinforcing their commitment to the technology they might offer to their customers.

2.2. For the State of Hawaii (and its constituents)

For the State of Hawaii, which is grappling with ambitious climate goals and the immediate impacts of fossil fuel dependence, DF5 offers a pragmatic and immediate pathway to progress:

• Accelerating Emissions Reduction Goals: Hawaii has committed to aggressive renewable energy targets, but the transition takes time. DF5 provides a means to achieve immediate and measurable reductions in greenhouse gases (GHG) and other harmful pollutants (like particulate matter and unburnt hydrocarbons) from the substantial portion of the economy still reliant on fossil fuels, particularly in the transportation and power generation sectors. It complements the long-term strategy for renewables by cleaning up the "tail" of fossil fuel use that will inevitably persist during the multi-decade transition. Every ton of CO2 or pound of particulate matter avoided now contributes to mitigating climate change and improving public health.

• Improving Air Quality and Public Health: The reduction in harmful emissions, particularly particulate matter and unburnt hydrocarbons, directly translates to improved air quality. For an island state like Hawaii, where pristine natural environments are crucial for tourism and quality of life, cleaner air is a significant benefit. Reduced air pollution also leads to positive public health outcomes, potentially lowering rates of respiratory illnesses and other pollution-related health conditions, thereby reducing healthcare costs for the state and its residents.

• Economic Benefits: Beyond environmental and health advantages, DF5 can deliver direct economic benefits to Hawaii. Potential fuel savings for businesses operating vehicle fleets (e.g., tour buses, delivery services, agricultural machinery) and for individual consumers can help alleviate the burden of Hawaii’s high energy costs. Reduced maintenance expenses for vehicles and equipment also contribute to savings. Supporting local businesses that adopt DF5 can stimulate economic activity and demonstrate a commitment to innovative, cost-effective environmental solutions.

• Strengthening Climate Resilience: By reducing the state's overall carbon footprint from existing fossil fuel consumption, DF5 helps strengthen Hawaii’s climate resilience while the longer-term transition to 100% renewable energy is underway. It demonstrates proactive measures to mitigate climate change, aligning with the state's policy objectives and public sentiment.

2.3. The Mutual Win-Win

The strategic introduction of DF5 creates a compelling opportunity for a mutual win-win scenario. For oil companies, it offers a pathway to demonstrate environmental stewardship, mitigate legal and reputational risks associated with climate change, and potentially enhance their product offerings. It allows them to be active participants in the solution, rather than being cast solely as contributors to the problem. This can foster a more constructive relationship with regulatory bodies and the public.

For the State of Hawaii, DF5 provides an immediate, cost-effective tool to make progress on its ambitious environmental and climate goals without waiting for the complete overhaul of its energy infrastructure. It helps improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing sources, and can offer economic relief to businesses and consumers through fuel and maintenance savings.

Ultimately, DF5 can serve as a catalyst for collaboration. Instead of an exclusively adversarial relationship, particularly in light of the ongoing lawsuit, DF5 can open doors for dialogue on practical, near-term solutions that benefit all parties. It provides a common ground where environmental responsibility and economic viability can intersect, paving the way for a more cooperative approach to navigating the energy transition in Hawaii.

Section 3: Strategic Introduction Approach

The successful introduction of DF5 in Hawaii requires a carefully phased strategic approach, tailored to engage key stakeholders effectively, build credibility, and foster widespread adoption. This approach should be sensitive to the existing legal and political climate while clearly articulating the win-win value proposition.

3.1. Phase 1: Initial Engagement & Education (Target: Key Influencers, Technical Teams)

• Objective: Build foundational awareness, establish technical credibility for DF5, and gather initial feedback from critical experts and decision-makers.

• Tactics:

  • Develop Comprehensive Briefing Materials: Create tailored information packages for different stakeholder groups (oil company technical teams, state environmental agencies, legal counsel). These materials should include:

    • The full "DF5 Research & Testing Report."

    • Summaries of third-party validation studies (Peak Petroleum, Larson, SwRI, SPL Labs).

    • Case studies demonstrating real-world efficacy and economic benefits.

    • Potential economic models projecting fuel savings and emissions reductions specific to Hawaiian fleet types or operational contexts (e.g., for tour buses, inter-island shipping, power generation).

  • Seek Discreet, High-Level Meetings: Request introductory meetings with:

    • Technical and environmental compliance teams within oil companies operating in or supplying Hawaii.

    • Key personnel in relevant State of Hawaii agencies (e.g., Department of Health - Clean Air Branch, Department of Transportation, Hawaii State Energy Office, Public Utilities Commission).

    • Potentially, and with extreme discretion, legal representatives involved in the Hawaii oil lawsuit, to explore if DF5 could feature in constructive dialogue or potential settlement frameworks (this requires careful navigation).

  • Focus on Data and Science: Emphasize the scientific validation of DF5, differentiating it from unsubstantiated fuel additives. Present the third-party test results clearly and transparently.

  • Propose Pilot Programs/Demonstration Projects: Offer to collaborate on limited-scale, independently monitored pilot programs with key fleet operators in Hawaii. This could include:

    • Public transportation fleets (e.g., TheBus in Honolulu).

    • Major commercial trucking or delivery companies.

    • Inter-island shipping companies or fishing fleets.

    • Operators of large stationary diesel generators. The goal of these pilots would be to generate local data on DF5’s performance and benefits under Hawaiian operating conditions, further building trust and a Hawaii-specific case.

3.2. Phase 2: Broader Stakeholder Outreach (Target: Policymakers, Business Leaders, Public Interest Groups)

• Objective: Generate broader support, create demand, and explore policy avenues for DF5 adoption.

• Tactics:

  • Engage with Hawaiian Legislators: Brief members of relevant legislative committees (e.g., Energy and Environmental Protection, Transportation, Economic Development) on DF5’s potential benefits for the state.

  • Present to Business Associations and Industry Groups: Engage with organizations like the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii, Hawaii Lodging & Tourism Association, and specific industry associations (e.g., trucking, shipping, agriculture) to highlight the economic and environmental advantages for their members.

  • Outreach to Environmental and Community Groups: Engage with credible environmental NGOs and community organizations to explain DF5’s role as a pragmatic bridge technology that can deliver immediate emission reductions, ensuring they understand it complements, rather than competes with, the push for renewables.

  • Consider a Targeted Public Information Campaign:Once initial buy-in from key stakeholders is achieved, a modest public information campaign could highlight the availability and benefits of cleaner fuel technologies like DF5. This should be carefully managed to avoid perceptions of greenwashing.

  • Emphasize the "Bridge Technology" Aspect:Consistently frame DF5 as a transitional solution that helps Hawaii meet its immediate environmental challenges while the long-term transition to 100% renewables continues. It is not a permanent replacement for fossil fuels but a way to make their necessary interim use cleaner.

3.3. Phase 3: Facilitating Collaboration & Adoption

• Objective: Drive widespread adoption and integration of DF5 into Hawaii’s energy ecosystem.

• Tactics:

  • Propose DF5 in Constructive Dialogues (re: Lawsuit): Explore, through appropriate channels, whether the adoption of DF5 (or similar proven emission-reducing treatments for supplied fuels) could be a component of constructive resolutions or settlement agreements related to the climate lawsuit. For example, oil companies might commit to treating a certain percentage of fuel sold in Hawaii or contribute to a fund that supports DF5 adoption by local fleets.

  • Explore Policy Incentives: Work with state policymakers to investigate potential incentives for the adoption of proven fuel treatments like DF5. This could include:

    • Tax credits or rebates for businesses that use DF5.

    • Inclusion of such treatments in state or county clean air plans or fleet modernization programs.

    • Recognition programs for companies demonstrating significant emissions reductions through such technologies.

  • Collaborate with Fuel Distributors: Partner with fuel distributors and retailers in Hawaii to make DF5-treated fuels readily available or to offer DF5 as an at-the-pump or bulk treatment option.

  • Establish Local Partnerships: Develop local partnerships for the distribution, sale, and technical support of DF5 in Hawaii, potentially creating local business opportunities.

  • Monitor and Report on Impact: Implement a system for tracking the adoption of DF5 and quantifying its impact on emissions reductions and fuel savings in Hawaii. This data will be crucial for demonstrating ongoing value and supporting further policy measures.

Section 4: Addressing Potential Challenges and Mitigations

The introduction of any new technology, particularly in a complex and often contentious field like energy and environmental solutions, will inevitably face challenges. Proactively identifying these potential hurdles and outlining mitigation strategies is crucial for the successful adoption of DF5 in Hawaii.

• Challenge: Clarification between "Fuel additives and Fuel modifier"

  • Context: The market has seen numerous fuel additives over the years, some with unverified claims, leading to a degree of skepticism among consumers and industry professionals.

  • Mitigation:

    • Emphasize Scientific Backing: Consistently position DF5 as a "fuel modifier" or "fuel treatment," not just an additive. Highlight its molecular-level action and the robust scientific validation from third-party laboratories (Peak Petroleum, Larson, SwRI, SPL Labs). Make the full "DF5 Research & Testing Report" and summaries of these tests readily available.

    • Differentiate from Unproven Products: Clearly articulate what makes DF5 different – its comprehensive 5-phase action, its benign chemical profile (no harmful metals or caustic elements), and its focus on a complete combustion cycle rather than just, for example, octane boosting or deposit cleaning alone.

    • Pilot Programs: Local, transparently monitored pilot programs in Hawaii will be critical in demonstrating tangible results and building trust with local stakeholders.

• Challenge: Cost Concerns

  • Context: Businesses and consumers, especially in a high-cost environment like Hawaii, will be sensitive to any additional upfront costs associated with treating fuel.

  • Mitigation:

    • Demonstrate Return on Investment (ROI):Develop clear, Hawaii-specific economic models showcasing the ROI from DF5 use. Factor in fuel savings due to improved efficiency, reduced maintenance costs (e.g., fewer injector issues, longer engine life), and potentially decreased DEF consumption for diesel engines.

    • Highlight Carbon Credit Value: If applicable and quantifiable, emphasize the potential for users to benefit from carbon credits generated by the measurable emissions reductions DF5 provides.

    • Flexible Pricing/Distribution Models: Explore options like bulk purchasing discounts for large fleets or partnerships with fuel distributors to integrate the cost smoothly.

• Challenge: "Greenwashing" Accusations

  • Context: With increasing awareness of environmental issues, stakeholders are wary of solutions that overstate their green credentials or are perceived as attempts by industries to appear more environmentally friendly than they are.

  • Mitigation:

    • Maintain Transparency: Be completely transparent about DF5’s capabilities and limitations. Provide access to all testing data and methodologies.

    • Rely on Third-Party Data: Consistently cite the findings from independent, reputable laboratories and the results from any local pilot programs.

    • Position Clearly as a Transitional Solution:Explicitly state that DF5 is a bridge technology designed to reduce harm from ongoing fossil fuel use during the transition to renewables. It is not presented as a final, zero-carbon solution. This honesty is crucial to maintaining credibility.

    • Focus on Measurable Impacts: Emphasize the quantifiable reductions in specific emissions (e.g., THC, particulate matter) and improvements in fuel efficiency.

• Challenge: Resistance from Parties Solely Focused on Immediate Fossil Fuel Abolition

  • Context: Some environmental advocates or policymakers may resist any technology that extends the viability of fossil fuel combustion, even if it makes that combustion cleaner.

  • Mitigation:

    • Frame DF5 as Pragmatic Harm Reduction:Argue that while the ultimate goal is a fossil-fuel-free future, the transition will take time. DF5 offers a pragmatic tool to significantly reduce environmental harm now from the millions of existing combustion engines that will remain in operation for years to come.

    • Highlight Complementarity with Renewables:Position DF5 not as an alternative to renewables, but as a complementary technology that helps manage the environmental burden of the interim period. Reducing emissions from the existing fleet makes the overall transition smoother and less damaging.

    • Engage in Constructive Dialogue: Seek to engage with these groups to explain the rationale and benefits of DF5 as part of a broader, realistic transition strategy, emphasizing the immediate positive impacts on air quality and emissions that benefit everyone while longer-term solutions are scaled.

By anticipating these challenges and preparing thoughtful mitigation strategies, the introduction of DF5 into the Hawaiian market can be managed more effectively, increasing the likelihood of its acceptance and successful adoption as a valuable bridge technology.

Section 5: Conclusion and Call to Action

DF5 is not a silver bullet for all energy challenges, nor is it a replacement for the vital long-term transition to 100% renewable energy. Instead, it is a scientifically validated, pragmatic, and immediately deployable bridge technology that can significantly reduce the harmful emissions and improve the efficiency of existing fossil fuel combustion engines during the crucial interim period.

For oil companies, embracing DF5 presents a pathway to demonstrate tangible environmental responsibility, potentially mitigate significant legal and reputational risks associated with climate change litigation, and enhance the value proposition of their products. It allows them to become proactive partners in Hawaii's journey towards a cleaner environment, shifting the narrative from confrontation to collaboration.

For the State of Hawaii, DF5 offers an immediate means to accelerate progress towards its emissions reduction goals, improve air quality for its residents and visitors, and realize economic benefits through fuel and maintenance savings for local businesses and consumers. It provides a practical tool to lessen the environmental burden of current fossil fuel use, thereby strengthening climate resilience while the comprehensive transition to renewable sources continues to advance.

The convergence of Hawaii's ambitious climate policies, its unique vulnerabilities, the ongoing legal context, and the proven benefits of DF5 technology creates a compelling case for its adoption. This strategic plan has outlined a phased approach—from initial education and pilot programs to broader stakeholder engagement and policy integration—designed to build trust, demonstrate local efficacy, and facilitate widespread adoption.

Call to Action:

We call for a spirit of open dialogue and collaboration among all key stakeholders: oil companies, the State of Hawaii (including its legislative, regulatory, and executive branches), GreenTec Labs (or the entity promoting DF5), local business leaders, and community representatives. The potential for a mutually beneficial outcome is significant, but it requires a willingness to explore innovative solutions and move beyond entrenched positions.

Next Steps for Engagement:

1. Initiate Dialogue: Seek to schedule initial, confidential briefings with representatives from major oil companies supplying Hawaii and key officials within the State government to present the DF5 technology, its validated benefits, and this strategic vision for a win-win outcome.

2. Propose Collaborative Pilot Programs: Formally propose the establishment of independently monitored pilot programs in Hawaii to generate local performance data and build stakeholder confidence.

3. Share Information Transparently: Make all relevant technical documentation, third-party test results, and case studies readily available to all interested parties.

4. Explore Integration into Policy and Planning: Engage with policymakers and energy planners to discuss how DF5 can be incorporated into Hawaii's existing clean energy initiatives, transportation plans, and air quality management strategies.

   
   

By working together, Hawaii's energy stakeholders can leverage DF5 Fuel Treatment as a powerful tool to make immediate, positive environmental and economic impacts, paving a smoother and cleaner path towards the state's ultimate goal of a sustainable and resilient energy future.

For more information visit DF5.us

IN THE NEWS:

1. Big Oil May Finally Have To Face Trial In Climate Deception Lawsuits. Why It Matters - And What Comes Next

2. USA: Supreme Court clears path for Hawaii's lawsuit against big oil's alleged misinformation

3. Supreme Court allows Hawaii climate change lawsuits against energy companies to move forward - CBS News

4. Fossil Fuel Litigation — Resilience Office - City and County of Honolulu Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency

5. Hawaii Sues Big Oil for Alleged Climate Deception After Trump Administration Tried to Block the Litigation

6. Hawaii Sues Big Oil For Alleged Climate Deception After Trump Administration Tried To Block The Litigation